● "130% financing," decoded

The 130% leverage — of what, exactly?

Two questions worth nailing down: when Ben says "like a 130% financing strategy," 130% of what — the down payment or the whole appraised value? And is the seller's capital contribution (or the trust) a pool of liquidity the buyer can tap for other projects? Short answers: it's of the appraised value, and no — it isn't spendable cash.

Financing layers stacked taller than the house

130% of the appraised value — not the down payment

It's not one loan at 130% LTV, and it's not a multiple of the down. It's the total financing stacked on the property — the senior loan plus the seller's carryback — measured against the appraised value.

Two layers of financing sit on the house. The senior DSCR / debt-fund loan is the conventional piece at roughly 70% of appraised value. On top of that, the seller's carried balance (their capital contribution) is a second layer of financing — money the buyer didn't have to bring. Add them and the total financing runs to about 130% of value. Because the senior loan alone is bigger than the cash actually needed at closing, the buyer brings ~nothing of their own and walks away with cash.

The capital stack on a $200,000 house

Senior loan + seller carryback = ~130% of value. The bar runs past the value line — that's the whole point.

100% of value = $200k Senior DSCR loan 70% LTV · ~$140,000 · first position Seller carryback capital contribution · ~$120,000 Total financing on the property ≈ $260,000 = 130% of value The senior $140k loan is more than the cash the deal needs: $80,000 → seller (their cash down)   ·   $20,000 → your assignment fee   ·   ~$40,000 → buyer's pocket Buyer's own cash in ≈ $0 — and they leave closing with ~$40k

$200k deal (Clip F)

  • Senior loan 70% = $140k
  • Seller carryback = $120k
  • Total = $260k = 130% of value
  • Of the $140k loan: $80k seller · $20k fee · ~$40k to buyer

$225k deal (Clip E)

  • Senior loan ~70% ≈ $150–157k
  • Seller carryback = $145k
  • Total ≈ $300k ≈ ~130% of value
  • Of the loan: ~$80k seller · ~$25–30k fee · ~$40k to buyer
So, plainly: "130%" = (senior loan + seller carryback) ÷ appraised value. It is not 130% of the down payment, and there is no single lender writing a 130% loan. The leverage above 100% exists only because the seller agreed to carry a big chunk as patient capital.

Can the buyer tap that capital contribution for other projects?

Locked equity vault vs accessible cash at closing
Locked equity vs. accessible cash — they're not the same thing.

This is the key misunderstanding to avoid. The seller's capital contribution is not a pile of cash sitting in the LLC's bank account. It's an accounting position — the seller's equity claim representing the balance the buyer still owes. There is nothing there to "withdraw."

Remember how the escrow leg works (Clip E): the transactional funder's money flows into escrow and right back out the same day — "they get their money back right after they submit it to escrow and we close with our fund." No lump of liquid cash is left parked inside the entity for the buyer to spend.

Where the buyer's real liquidity comes from

What the buyer can NOT do

Watch for this

If a buyer could freely tap it, that's a red flag

The seller's capital contribution / trust corpus is supposed to be locked to this deal as their protected position. If the structure actually let the buyer sweep that money into other projects, the seller's "equity" would be hollow — exactly the kind of thing the Risk module warns about. Liquidity for other projects should come from the buyer's own cash-out, not the seller's carried capital.

Educational analysis based on the recorded examples; figures are round numbers and exact loan sizing, LTV, and whether any funds are truly held (vs. a book entry) depend on the specific lender and documents. Confirm with a qualified attorney and CPA before relying on any of it.